Saturday, April 3, 2010

There's a Gadget for That: the lemon juicer


My most absolute favorite kitchen gadget is Tool’s Design lemon juicer found at the MOMA design store. I have two. I show it to all my friends when I am cooking. It will be my gift of choice at Christmas. Everyone needs one. Or two. It is the perfect thing.


Most people use a classic type of juicer which consists of a shape similar to the inverted fruit, usually attached to a juice catching dish. And like most juicer’s, because the shape reflects the shape of the fruit, the design seems like a natural solution to the problem of extraction. All function. No style. Waste of space. Please discard.


In my world, Phillip Starck became the person who turned the ordinary into something innovative, controversial and yet practical. For years his 1990 Alessi Juicy Salif dominated the well-designed juicer category. While Starck’s piece is whimsical with a playful sense of menace (it reminds one of the aliens from War of the Worlds), it takes up too much space with its 11.5 inch height and 5.5 inch diameter and it tends to occupy a place on the counter as an objet. It has become precious. It screams: “look at me”. Starck is rumored to have said: “My juicer is not meant to squeeze lemons, it is meant to start conversations”.




The Tool’s Design lemon juicer was designed in 1995 by Henrik Holbaek and Claus Jensen. It won the Danish Formland prize. It also starts conversations.



It is a polished stainless steel spiral 3.25 inches long and .75 inches in diameter. Operation is simple: Insert the tool directly into the fruit, invert and, with a squeeze, all of the juice pours out. Until I discovered this tool, I had never found a device that gets this much juice out of a lemon or lime.



Vitruvis (30 B.C.) said that architecture must contain three elements simultaneously: Commodity, Firmness, and Delight. Paul Goldberger translates this to present day and states that a good “building must be simultaneously useful, well built and visually appealing.”1. I believe that these three elements should always be considered crucial to good design.


What I love about the Tool’s Design lemon juicer is that it does just that: it strides beyond its function. It is elegant, simple, sturdy. It implies motion, it demands action. It also fits neatly on my finger and would make for a nice piece of jewelry were not the cutting edge so sharp. There is a grace and elegance to it. The curve is soft but it also has an element of ferocity because of the sharp edge that drives into the fruit. It is the ultimate in simplicity yet works very hard in its functional capacity. It is sculpture. Everything in the kitchen should have so much thought given to the design.


The designers were inspired by the method a juice seller used to sell orange juice to tourists in India. The man entered the bus, softened the orange with his palms, jabbed a piece of tubing into it and pressed out a glass of juice. For Holbaek and Jensen “the problem comes first”2 and they decided to examine how to make a consumer tool that did the exact same thing.



They knew it had to be sharp and had to break through the separate chambers in the fruit. They came upon their solution through a great deal of thought and hard work. Ultimately the solution came about as a “complete surprise and really a lucky strike”2. They were considering the threading geometry of a screw and while wrapping a piece of aluminum around a broom handle; they stumbled upon the complete product. It was a project that solved itself.


In the end the tool only works on lemons and not oranges but “unknowing about that, we started with a blank canvas which is always a good way to start if you want to discover something new.2


Like the Juicy Salif before it, this tool is a conversation starter. Over the last few decades the kitchen has become the epicenter of home entertainment. When friends gather for dinner, everyone crowds around the kitchen either participating in the cooking or participating by keeping the cook company. Gone are the days of the sequestered housewife serving the guests like a waitress. This is the arena in which people will observe and absorb cooking techniques. The lemon juicer by Tools Design has never failed to spark curiosity, admiration and conversation.




1Why Architecture Matters by Paul Goldberger. p.7

2From an interview conducted with Henrik Holbaek. Feb 21,2010

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Welcome to the Blog


I originally thought of calling this blog “The Elements of Style “(you all better know your Strunk and White!) but that name felt like it would imply that the blog is only about fashion. And there already is a blog called Elements of Style and it is about fashion. So there.


I want the range of topics to be much broader. By using “elements” as the subject, it implies that each topic is really only a part of another whole. For example, if I am discussing a particularly graceful kitchen tool, it is only one element of my kitchen, simply a part of what I include in my home. If the topic is about new architecture in my neighborhood, the buildings I talk about are only a part of the larger whole. The perfect white shirt is only one element of how I adorn myself.


At its heart, the blog will be about design. Design is very important to me and I am very passionate about it. It touches nearly everything in my life and all of my choices as a consumer. I consider the design of everything that I purchase: furniture, lighting, clothing, air purifiers, kitchen appliances. The articles with which I surround myself, especially lighting, furniture and interior design, lead to a comfortable and satisfying home atmosphere. And some things make me extremely happy.


I intend to discuss the style of each of element, how it relates to us and explore its social and cultural implications.


But, have no fear; fashion will be a big topic. It is a part of me. A big part of me. And a big part of my friends. Hee.

The Perfect White Shirt

Part 1

When I started writing about the perfect white shirt, I thought I would exhaust the topic in fewer than 500 words. Not so. I have a feeling this will take 3-4 posts. Hee!

So, what is it about the white shirt and why do we seek its perfection? Why do we desire it? Lust after it?

We have a relationship with the clothes we choose. It is one of the ways we express ourselves, let the world in on a part of who we are. It is an element of our personal style.

The perfect white shirt is iconic. It’s white, it’s bright, it demands to be looked at. Bright colors attract attention and scream, “look at me” but the white shirt does so without saying so.



















For me, it was Audrey Hepburn, in her “boyfriend” white shirt or the timeless crisp short sleeve from “Roman Holiday” and Katharine Hepburn, in her tailored version, who turned my attention to the perfect white shirt (there aren’t a ton of Katharine pics, but we do remember her in the PWS)










But it was Carolina Herrera who got me thinking that I might be able to have one for myself. It was something that existed in the marketplace and not just in the stylist’s cache. I loved the apparently simple design paired with a formal skirt or jodhpurs. Very fitted with cuffs and collar keeping their shape. Also very white.



Still, why? Ms Herrera, who has made that shirt the mainstay of her personal style, said that “fashion is to please your eye.” What pleases the eye makes us feel good. The perfect white shirt elevates every skirt or pant. A well-made garment makes us feel a little richer, a little better looking, a little more confident. The perfect white shirt definitely pleases the eye.

The perfect fit, the right fabric, the correct sleeve length, the cuff and collar, the design elements, the strength and shape of the button, the various price points, the intention (whether or not it is meant to be formal or casual) it all goes into the perfect white shirt.

The designer, Anne Fontaine, appears to be on the quest for many perfect white shirts. According to Wallpaper magazine she conceives of 500 white shirts per season, 1000 per year. That is 17,500 to date. Really? Really! Another source, however, sites that her production is a bit lower: 300 designs per year. Regardless 5,100 variations on the white shirt are still impressive.

































As evidenced in the spring/summer 2010 collection she has ventured into other colors. But to me she is the leading force in the pursuit of the perfect white shirt. For more Anne Fontaine click here.